Why Do We Need International Agreement

Often, claims about the environmental impact of plastic disposal are based on life cycle assessments (LCAs) of a limited number of environmental aspects, e.B carbon dioxide emissions and sloping land, and do not necessarily take into account the impact of plastic on marine and terrestrial animals. Many life cycle analyses have been carried out by the plastics industry, they are based on a variety of variables and assumptions, are easy to handle and should be considered with caution. The graph compares global carbon emissions (data from ref. 20) with plastic production (21); The ratification of international political interventions is also noted. These two extremely complex challenges may be progressing at a similar pace in terms of emissions, but the development of strategies to reduce and prevent plastic pollution lags behind those created and agreed to limit carbon emissions. The legal vacuum must now be filled and these efforts must be met by a new legally binding agreement on plastic pollution, which can solve the problem at the source through the production of covered plastic. The EIA works at national (UK), European and international level and works with organisations around the world that share our goals and visions. Tackling the plastic pollution crisis is beyond the capacity of any country, region or sector and necessarily requires an international response. At present, there is no such framework for coordinating action at the global level, as confirmed by an in-depth review by UN Environment, which concluded that “there is no global agreement to specifically prevent plastic waste and microplastics in the ocean or to provide a comprehensive approach to the life cycle management of plastics”. [1] In this context, no plastic is sent to landfills and less raw materials are needed.

Like the goals of a “green economy”, the plastic economy can be stabilized and become more ecologically and socially responsible. To do this, waste producers and managers must work together to produce materials that can be managed sustainably. This should include incentives for the production of plastics made from inert chemicals that can be fully recycled and reused, or from truly biodegradable materials that are completely degraded and reintroduced into the natural carbon cycle (17). This will encourage innovation and redesign of chemically inert materials that are truly biodegradable, 100% recyclable and/or made from materials recycled after the consumer. 1.17 Responsibility for Superior Services. For each agreement, a federal government department is identified as the lead lead department, which is primarily responsible for that agreement. Normally, the lead department is identified as part of the consultation process leading to Canada`s ratification of an agreement. Publications such as The Compendium of International Environmental Agreements and Foreign Affairs Canada`s International Environmental Agreements Database (available on the Department`s website) list senior departments.

United Nations governments have started working on a Global Ocean Treaty, and if they do it right, it will give us the legal tools we need to start creating these new marine protected areas. In a turbulent political climate, this would be a significant demonstration of how international cooperation can and should work to protect our common homeland. .